Monday, July 21, 2014

James Carrion to Podcasters: Deception Inherent to Ufology; Don't Focus on the Signal, Focus on the Noise

James Carrion is a former international director of the Mutual UFO Network, a former signals intelligence analyst for the US Army and an IT manager. He is the author of the recently released book, The Rosetta Deception, in which he presents research focusing on the years 1946 and 1947 that suggests deception operations conducted by the intelligence community likely effected public perception of UFOs. Carrion was interviewed by hosts of The Paracast Gene Steinberg and Christopher O'Brien in a two and a half hour podcast published July 20. I think some of his perspectives deserve consideration, so let's jump right in.


Just prior to the 17-minute mark of the podcast, Carrion was asked where he first saw evidence of deception in ufology.

"I would have to say during the time I was in MUFON," he explained. "When I first joined the organization, just like everybody else, I was very curious. I wanted to know why this subject was still a mystery. The more I started to look into it, the more I started to research it, and the higher that I got up in the organization, the more I could see that there was a large element of human deception involved.

"A lot of the cases, for example, that I investigated personally during MUFON, there was no paranormal. There was no extraterrestrial aspect to a lot of these cases. A lot of it boiled down to strange people passing strange stories – and of questionable backgrounds – and really trying to spin the whole rumor mill around the subject."

Carrion offered a couple examples of such circumstances, then added, "We get a lot of these strange characters that just pop into the UFO field. They make these grandiose claims and none of it really pans out."


At the 2:06:30 point of the interview, Carrion commented on MUFON in general. Are they sincere or advancing disinformation?

"I don't think you can really label it that easily. I think there are folks that genuinely have – in the organization – that have a genuine interest in knowing the truth. I think there are folks in the organization that are very much true believers and they discard a lot of evidence presented to them... I've fallen out of favor with MUFON in that they lost their way. Their motto is the scientific investigation of UFOs and you would be hard pressed to find anything that resembles science in that organization.

"I think that's reflected in these shows that they're doing on Discovery Channel. You know, it's almost embarrassing to watch to see MUFON lower themselves to repeating mythology and repeating folklore and repeating outrageous allegations, and not sticking to what they should be sticking to, which is pure science."


At 2:16:00, Carrion addressed challenges inherent to investigating reported UFO sightings.

"It mostly had to do with deception. There was some level of deception. I call it 'unknown deception' because I don't know if these folks that perpetrated it had a personal reason for doing it – ya know, they just wanted to go out there and perpetrate a hoax, if there was a money aspect to it or there may be an intelligence agency aspect to it. All I know, it was human involvement and nothing highly strange about it."

He continued, "I have to say something that I think a lot of people in ufology may not like to hear, and that is - I think the bottom line is - there are folks that are in the field that call themselves ufologists, call themselves researchers, investigative journalists – whatever they want to call themselves, it doesn't really matter – but when their modus operandi is to perpetuate the mystery instead of solving it, we have a big issue. We have a big problem because the mystery will never get resolved as long as these people are out there hawking their latest theories or the latest controversy for controversy's sake, or their latest witness, or their latest 'lead' investigation – whatever you want to call it, it doesn't really matter – but if you don't have a sincere interest in truth, if you're simply interested in making the rounds of the UFO talk circuit... you're part of the problem, not part of the solution."


Around the 1:29:00 point, Carrion was asked if any UFOs are "real".

"Ya know, honestly I can't tell you. I'm not saying that every single UFO sighting in 1946 or 1947 had to be Rosetta or our intelligence community. Who knows? There are things out there in the universe we simply can't explain. There are mysteries that we can't explain. All I know is that in such a concentrated time frame we had very strange things going on that to me fit more a Cold War and intelligence operation than fit any sort of other explanation.

"Could there have been other things flying around the atmosphere? Sure. What they are, I don't know. All I know is that what I've been able to research and what I have been able to uncover here shows more of a terrestrial explanation."


1:36:30 Could some of the early reported abductions have been mind control or drug experiments?

"I would say that may very well be, so I think it may be part of this mushrooming; this inability to contain what started off as a myth that was created by mundane hands."


1:53:00 Absent deliberate deception, does any evidence remain that points to an extraterrestrial explanation?

"Well, I can tell you that my belief is that what the activity surrounded in 1946 and 1947 was, from my point of view, a strategic deception operation, so definitely involving military intelligence agencies. That's a very interesting question because this is where we get into the bucket argument. What I call the bucket argument is that people who are believers or that truly believe in UFOs and extraterrestrial visitation, they want to have one bucket of evidence. Everything gets thrown into this bucket, right? From the building of the pyramids to the foo fighters to ghost rockets to Roswell to you name it, it all goes into one large bucket. If you try to take anything out of that bucket, well, no, no, no, you can't, because all the other stuff in the bucket means it's extraterrestrial or there's 'proof' there.

"I think that is not the way to approach the subject at all. I think you have to compartmentalize your research. I think you have to focus your research into certain discreet cases and discreet time frames, and, really, you can't just pile up all the evidence and say it all makes sense together. It simply doesn't, because, I'll be honest, and tell you that I believe that there is life out there in the universe. I think the possibility of life not being out there, life not being out there, is absolutely nil. Statistically, there is life out there on other planets.

"The question is have they arrived here, either today, in the near past or in the very distant past. It's very plausible that we had alien visitation way back whenever, or it could be very plausible that we have alien visitation today. So I'm not saying that's not a possibility. I'm not saying that at all.

"What I am advocating is that the early days of UFOs – the modern day UFO era, 1946-1947, that time frame - I don't believe had anything to do with extraterrestrial visitation."


2:04:00 Does the intelligence community manipulate the public perception of ET and possibly such circumstances as the Skinwalker Ranch to its advantage?

"Absolutely. I think the large amount of mythology that surrounds Area 51, for example, a lot of that was originated in the military as an operation to just cover up what was really happening at Area 51, which was very mundane in nature. So I think that the intelligence establishment uses the phenomena, uses the mythology, uses the subject to cover up any number of mundane operations.

"Ya know, I found that my involvement with Robert Bigelow and Skinwalker Ranch – the fact that I basically paid my own way to go there and was refused entry on the ranch - that lack of transparency tells me that there is something else going on. This whole subject is so muddied already, what you don't need is more cover up, more deception, more obfuscation.

"When I started seeing that in the whole MUFON-BAASS relationship, that's when I started to question what's really behind all of that and I voiced my opinions to the board. All of it was history after that because they went behind my back and renegotiated that contract.

"The bottom line being that I think – and this is very well known – that if you think you can dance with these intelligence agencies and they don't want you to dance with them, you're never gonna dance. The bottom line is there will be a way where you'll end up on the outside of that. I think there is a very interesting dance happening between ufology and the intelligence organizations that have more to do with what the goals of the intelligence agencies are than a cover up of extraterrestrial visitation."


More on Bigelow, BAASS and MUFON at 2:22:00.

"There very much has to be a large amount of transparency when you're going to be involved in something of this nature. You can't hide anything. So, for example, when Bigelow hid the source of his funding and would only reveal it to John Schuessler on the MUFON board, that lack of transparency really rubs me the wrong way. That tells me there's something being hidden for a certain purpose and I don't want to be involved in that."


More on the Skinwalker Ranch at 2:29:00.

"You know, the Skinwalker Ranch to me is interesting for a couple reasons. To me, the mythology – and I'll call it mythology because I don't think what's written in the book is accurate – this is based on personal investigation from when I went there and was denied access to the ranch, and then finding out that the brother of the original owner of the ranch, before it was sold to Bigelow, was very adamant in saying that nothing paranormal or strange in nature happened while his brother was owner of the ranch. He knows this because he was on the ranch many times. So I think there was a mythology built around that, in the same way that a mythology gets built around a number of cases that end up on the silver screen as a 'true story'."

Carrion also stated, "There's a mythology that was being built up. Why was it being built up? I think it had somewhat to do with the mythology surrounding Area 51. Somebody wants to continue that mythology. The same way that the mythology is continued around Dulces, New Mexico, and underground bases and a lot of the stuff that we hear about that really has no substantiation.

"Just because a billionaire owns the ranch, and a book is out there written by folks that allegedly were on the ranch, doesn't make it true."

Summing up events surrounding Bigelow and the Skinwalker Ranch, Carrion stated, "All I know is somebody is obfuscating what is really going on, and I don't think it has to do with protecting people's lives [concerning the lack of access and lack of transparency]. I think it's something else."


2:08:00 How can the average person separate signal from noise? What would Carrion tell a young person getting involved in ufology?

"I would say, based on my years of exposure, don't focus on the signal, focus on the noise. There's a lot to be learned from the noise.

"It's almost – I've said this quite a few times – the absence of evidence is as telling as the presence of evidence. So if you go into this field with an open mind, you put aside your beliefs, you really look to see why there's so much noise surrounding this field. Pay attention to the noise. Pay attention to the characters that are in the field.

"Make sure that you check their sources. Make sure you check every single fact. You better be a fact checker, because if you're not a fact checker, you're gonna be at the recipient end of disinformation, hoaxes and just being led down the primrose path that a lot of ufologists find themselves.

"The bottom line is to go out there with a sincere desire to know truth and to learn truth, no matter how hurtful that truth may be, even if it hurts your own beliefs. Look for that truth."


The full podcast includes James Carrion discussing his book, The Rosetta Deception, his thoughts on controversial writer/researcher William Moore, former Director of Central Intelligence Roscoe Hillenkoetter who joined the UFO research organization National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), strategic deception, intriguing high strangeness and much more. Learn more about Carrion and his work at his blogs Follow the Magic Thread and The Rosetta Deception

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Put WIT on Your List of Satire Sites, and Somebody Tell Stubblebine and Laibow

A website hosting the so-called Wyoming Institute of Technology is posting outrageous and unsubstantiated claims, apparently under the increasingly popular click-bait guise of satire. A quick web search indicated several bloggers and forum visitors to be aware of the circumstances, but it seems no one sent retired intelligence expert Gen. Stubblebine or his writer/researcher wife Dr. Laibow a memo. 

Stubblebine and Laibow

Regular readers of The UFO Trail are aware of posts involving the activities of retired career intelligence officer Gen. Albert Stubblebine III and his wife, Dr. Rima Laibow. The controversial couple have been splashing the pot in UFO and conspiracy circles for decades now. Their endeavors include Stubblebine being credited with an influential role in Project STAR GATE, a now declassified CIA-funded Remote Viewing initiative. Prominently featured in Jon Ronson's The Men Who Stare at Goats, Stubblebine was also recognized during his career as responsible for redesigning the intelligence structure of the entire US Army. Laibow worked extensively with alleged alien abductees, was a proponent of hypnosis used as a memory retrieval tool and reportedly considers herself an experiencer of such abduction-like phenomena. 

It is for such reasons that from time to time I browse the website of the nonprofit organization, Natural Solutions Foundation, founded by the couple. Gen. Bert and Dr. Rima, as they are known to their supporters, regularly post warnings about an alleged band of global elites who aim to murder the vast majority of the human population. This, according to the general and doctor, is being accomplished through such means as turning children into autistic worker drones by way of harmful injections disguised as vaccinations, and poisoning the population via chemtrails. A healthy food supply is also at risk of dwindling into nonexistence, Dr. Rima frequently reports, in addition to numerous other ominous warnings consistently published by the couple.

Laibow's Latest

Laibow's latest piece, published July 7, opened with a warning to readers to hold on to their hats and brace themselves for a rough read. The medical doctor and psychiatrist proceeded to explain how we are virtually all what was termed "specimens in a laboratory", involuntary participants in an experiment "not going well".

Laibow wrote, emphasis hers, "First, scientists at the Wyoming Institute of Technology scanned 3000 people in the US. 1000 of them already were implanted with RFID (Radio Frequency Identification), about which they knew nothing. That's one in three people!"

Whoa! Emphasis mine. 

Get outta town, I thought. A study conducted by a credible research facility in which some thousand people were identified as being unwittingly implanted with RFID chips? I would indeed want to read those reports. Was there any such substantiated published work?

Well, no, not really. You saw that coming, didn't ya?

WIT

Turns out the Wyoming Institute of Technology, which uses the acronym WIT (wink, wink...), operates a website which, by all reasonable evaluation, appears satirical, albeit more deceptively so than many might deem appropriate. The RFID story in question stated research subjects were supposedly found to have implants. WIT added that the implants were probably covertly administered during dental procedures and presented the story in somewhat of a format of a research paper. 

Serious academic website? Consider the posted conditions of touring the supposed facility, for instance, in which visitors must be willing to take iodine tablets for their own safety due to the "'Halls of Plutonium' exhibit, which is prominently featured along the tour route", and the stipulation that Muslims must obtain written permission from Homeland Security to enter.   

Then there are the satirical WIT employment opportunities. Researchers are well paid and offered very attractive bonuses if their findings correlate with expectations of private-sector funding partners. Night shift custodians are needed who will remove "medical waste" stored in black bags a few feet long and weighing a couple hundred pounds or so, and dump them in a river, making sure the bags sink.

Evolving Beliefs

Ha ha. Okay, real funny. Another website detrimental to understanding actuality while twisting and distorting factual aspects of certain circumstances to the point of beyond recognition. 

So why is Laibow citing such a story? It took me all of a half hour to form what I felt was a reasonable conclusion of the lack of authenticity of the WIT website and so-called research endeavors. I was so convinced their content is satirical that I chose not to bother to research the authors, browse Wyoming public records or similar options - and suffice it to say I'm neither a career intelligence professional nor married to one. 

Perhaps the answers to that question, why Laibow cites such dubious sources, are related to the reasons she and Gen. Stubblebine say and do many of the things they do, whatever those reasons may be. I would not venture an all inclusive conclusion, but I speculate such circumstances represent a greater role in the intentional manipulation of opinions and beliefs than many would prefer to consider. 

........................................................................

Related posts:

Ufology and Alleged Post-MKULTRA Mind Control

John Alexander, Contradictions and Unanswered Questions

Influence of the Intelligence Community in Ufology

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Exploring the UFO Cover Up

The topic of Jeff Ritzmann's latest Paranormal Waypoint was alleged UFO cover up. The show aired on KGRA Radio the evening of Tuesday, June 24. I found listening and following along in the chat room to be time well spent.

As the episode came to a close, Ritzmann suggested he finds the topic quite interesting and could discuss it for hours. I can relate to that, and would therefore like to write some about it.

Buzz Killer of a Topic

For one thing, I particularly appreciated Ritzmann's willingness to address at length the complexities of UFOs as they relate to spy games, deception operations and disinformation. Important phrase here, please: This is typically not an activity that garners much support. As a matter of fact, careful and accurate examination of government UFO-related sleight of hand is entirely likely to substantially decrease one's popularity within the UFO community.

There are several reasons that is the case. All of those reasons pretty much boil down to the same thing, though: Supporters of the ETH – or even those who tend to see UFOs as indicative of some kind of yet to be understood high strangeness – become insecure. If we can get past that and understand there are many extremely interesting aspects of ufology that do not necessarily have anything to do with the experiences and perceptions of anyone in particular, we liberate ourselves to embark on some very intriguing subject matter.

You know how it goes, though. Reporting on hoaxes and professional photo analysis just are not crowd pleasers. It's very similar with considerations of spooks in ufology in that if you suggest the G-Men are hanging around for any other reasons than to hide and explore an alien presence, or at the least a mysterious phenomenon, you're often encouraged to pack up your research and take it down the road. I therefore appreciated Ritzmann's careful and measured approach to the topic.

Why so Much Official Interest in Ufology if There's No Cover Up?

As Ritzmann explained, there are actually many reasons the intelligence community might take an interest in manipulating circumstances and reports surrounding public perception of UFOs. Those reasons include but are by no means limited to:

- Leading global adversaries to fear extraordinary "UFOs" are actually advanced exotic US aircraft and weapons of which they are defenseless.

- Leading adversaries to fear UFOs may actually be alien spacecraft, of which any number of concerns should arise, including US officials have reverse engineered aspects of the craft and/or collaborated with the occupants to receive access to advanced technology.

- Leading adversaries to frustratingly conclude they have become confused about UFOs to the point of accepting they have virtually no idea what is flying around, who flies it or what its capabilities may be (not entirely unlike many members of the UFO community).

- Meme creation and tracking, which have been repeatedly demonstrated by agencies such as the USAF and DARPA to be prioritized and valued for psychological warfare reasons ranging from spreading dissent to manipulating superstitions.

- The use of public perception of the UFO phenomenon as cover for classified operations that have nothing to do with unexplained aerial phenomena, extraterrestrial life or anything of the kind. 

Many more reasons could be listed with citations of confirmed examples. It's not just hypothetical by any means, but documented Cold War history.

Further complicating the already complex circumstances is the popular yet unsubstantiated suspicion of an all-knowing, ultra secret governmental body that scrupulously conceals the answers to all our questions. There is almost certainly no small group of select individuals or single person aware of details about everything of ufological interest ranging from Roswell to Rendelsham. Neither is there a lone reason employed for some 70 years as to why the intelligence community manipulates various circumstances that we, in UFO circles, typically interpret to be related to ufology. There are lots of different reasons. Specific purposes change from one circumstance to the next. There is no single reason Uncle Sam - and his evolving personnel from one era to the next - would go to so much trouble; it involved matters of opportunity, necessity and feasibility from any given situation to another.

To many a UFO enthusiast the issues of interest become if the powers that be have any direct knowledge of the actual nature of UFOs and if they are intentionally covering it up. As Ritzmann aptly pointed out, that is going to be difficult to conclusively answer for a lot of reasons. One of the biggest challenges is that learning more is no longer a matter of getting just Uncle Sam to open his archives - and difficult as that may have been. Those days are gone and it's now even more complicated.

The Other CIAs

Controversial philanthropist Robert Bigelow has been flip flopping between acting as a funding source and pulling the rug out from under ufologists for decades. If he has obtained any information of particular relevance, many would argue we'd sooner get the NSA to lay their cards on the table – and assuming, of course, they're not virtually one and the same. In preparation for a previous post, I asked Col. John Alexander a few questions about his interpretations of some situations in which he was involved with Bigelow at the time, including the Carpenter Affair and if the colonel was at liberty to discuss relationships between Bigelow corporations and intelligence agencies.

"You should ask Bigelow if you are interested in old affairs," Alexander replied

Private citizens and private corporations, under no obligations to the Freedom of Information Act and conducting what amount to intelligence operations, may pose some of the greatest challenges of all to researchers' abilities to document actuality. The difficulties are in all likelihood an intentional outcome whether or not the UFO mystery may have played a minor role in their design.

A former BAH contractor
you may have heard of
Washington, DC-based consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton reports an annual revenue approaching six billion dollars. Some 99% of its contracts are awarded from the US Federal government, including the NSA, FBI, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Army and Marines. The corporation is a popular employment option for both current and former professional intelligence personnel, and its executives have included former and future high ranking officials and directors of such agencies as the CIA, NSA, National Intelligence Agency and Homeland Security, among others.

You're not going to be getting access to BAH's files. Not now, not in the foreseeable future and probably not ever. There will be no declassification process, and BAH is but one corporation of many providing Uncle Sam with options for intelligence outsourcing; options that some liken to non-governmental CIAs. Those would be, in effect, intelligence agencies never subjected to Congressional oversight.

Mirage Men

I'm not trying to tell you there are no UFOs – and neither did Ritzmann. But I am most certainly trying to tell you to at least suspend judgment pending verifiable information before you draw conclusions about what roles the intelligence community may have played in the apparent UFO mystery.

Another point of interest for me on Paranormal Waypoint Tuesday was a situation described by Ritzmann relating to the complexities of trying to reason our way through subject matter so often involving deception. He explained a circumstance about witnesses who apparently did not know each other and resided far apart, yet offered similar testimony. Ritzmann questioned whether or not such a situation might be as credible as it initially appears, considering the resources available to professional architects of deception. Ritzmann particularly questioned the decision-making process of researchers who choose to accept such witness testimony as accurate and subsequently promote it. 

I happen to currently be reading The Rosetta Deception by James Carrion. While any number of circumstances could be cited involving procedures to intentionally cultivate rumors and spread propaganda that would justify Ritzmann's concerns, I will call on Carrion since his work happens to currently be sitting on my desk.

Head of the covert BSC William Stephenson,
credited with changing American public
 perception of issues related to World War II
On page 62, in a chapter in which Carrion conclusively demonstrates the manners a rumor can be simultaneously spread by multiple sources, including news agencies seemingly 'verifying' the story by quoting one another, he documented protocol as developed by the British Security Coordination. "Rumors are most effective," the BSC trained its personnel during the mid 20th century, "if they can be originated in several different places simultaneously and in such a way that they shuttle back and forth, with each new report apparently confirming previous ones."

The skilled and effective BSC also noted that a good rumor should never be traceable to its source. Please be advised that there is indeed no substitute for actually confirming a claim. Verifiable evidence available for public review is virtually the only circumstance that justifies anything more than suspension of judgment in such situations.

I'd like to leave you with one more consideration, please. I was recently reviewing rather fascinating circumstances described in a now declassified CIA report written by Edward F. Deshere and titled, Hypnosis in Interrogation. Deshere described the deviously deceptive work of MKULTRA Subproject 84 lead researcher Dr. Martin Orne and his "magic room":
A captive's anxiety could be heightened, for example, by rumors that the interrogator possesses semi-magical techniques of extracting information. A group of collaborating captives could verify that interrogees lose all control over their actions, and so on. After such preliminary conditioning, a "trance" could be induced with drugs in a setting described by Orne as the "magic room," where a number of devices would be used to convince the subject that he is responding to suggestions. For instance, a concealed diathermy machine could warm up his hand just as he receives the suggestion that his hand is growing warmer. Or it might be suggested to him that when he wakes up a cigarette will taste bitter, it having been arranged that any cigarettes available to him would indeed have a slight but noticeably bitter taste. With ingenuity a large variety of suggestions can be made to come true by means unknown to the subject. Occasionally these manipulations would probably elicit some form of trance phenomenon, but the crucial thing would be the situation, not the incidental hypnotic state. The individual could legitimately renounce responsibility for divulging information much as if he had done it in delirium.

Perhaps Deshere is giving us a glimpse into one of the most intriguing aspects of all of the Mirage Men's elusive tricks: They did not have to perfect the brainchildren born in the labs of mad scientists – or necessarily even get the ideas to work at all – as much as lead the world to believe so. A preferred mind control technique may have been to lead a subject to believe his handlers possessed effective mind control techniques.

Did similar deceptions come into play in UFO Land as depicted by Mark Pilkington in his book and resulting film? Certainly so. The relevant questions become the extents and specific circumstances.

Is the UFO cover up more about leading certain people to believe there is a cover up than there actually is one? That would certainly serve some deceptive purposes as listed above, such as confusing and inducing fear in adversaries. However, I think the answers to such questions ultimately depend on each specific circumstance.

Many documents will remain classified that reveal secrets of Mirage Men tactics involving the manipulation of beliefs of alien visitors and UFOs, yet had nothing to do with what some might describe as actual UFO phenomena. See the complexities of declassifying such information - and the inherent impracticality to a formal UFO disclosure?

While official lips remain sealed about some Mirage Men operations, ufologists will continue to often incorrectly interpret that lack of government disclosure as necessarily indicative of an orchestrated UFO cover up. Where the line is drawn, and what the differences may be, between UFO-related deceptions and actual phenomena will remain intriguing questions – and probably unanswered – for a long, long time.

Friday, June 20, 2014

Hypnosis as a Criminal Defense

I was recently alerted via a tweet by Dr. Jeffrey Kaye of a declassified CIA memo I found interesting. Kaye is a San Francisco Bay area psychologist and writer who focuses upon human rights issues, the intelligence community and related circumstances.

The 5 May 1955 memo is titled, Hypnotism and Covert Operations. Its author is not identified. The memo contains such ominous observations as the potential of hypnosis as a covert weapon would be more thoroughly understood if field experiments, that could not be conducted by what was termed a laboratory worker, were carried out.

Such CIA documents are unfortunately not unusual for the era. What caught my eye about this particular memo, however, was a reference to an unspecified legal case in which a hypnotist was apparently convicted for the actions of their hypnosis subject. After you take a moment to let that settle in, please consider, and I quote:
Currently there is a murder trial in [redacted] in which the murderer has been judged to have been under hypnosis at the time of the crime. He has been retried, released and the hypnotist tried and convicted. The case is now under appeal. The comment of the three knowledgeable informants was that the hypnotist must have been a rank amateur to have been found out since any experienced operator would have known how to suggest away the fact that he had arranged the crime.

Wow. Is that the voice of experience, or just speculation, one might be inclined to ask.

Initial research of such circumstances revealed an 1895 New York Times article titled, Hypnotism as a Defense. While the Kansas case explored is obviously not the case referenced in the 1955 CIA memo, it is indeed interesting.

Matters of money seemed to result in Anderson Gray's desire to murder a rival. He apparently used his study of hypnosis to persuade a subject to attempt, unsuccessfully, to carry out the crime. However, the greedy man's fate - and the fate of his rival - were sealed when he tried a second time!

The evil doer was accused of hypnotizing yet another subject and framing the circumstances in a manner that would justify the subject killing the target, which took place. Given the court's interpretation of the circumstances and the bizarre history, Gray was convicted of a murder committed by another man, his hypnosis subject.

A more likely candidate for the case mentioned in the CIA memo was a 1950's era chain of events occurring in Denmark involving Bjorn Nielsen and Palle Hardrup. Sources include The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X, among others. In a complex series of trials, retrials and reversals surrounding bank robbery and murder, hypnotist Nielsen was convicted for the actions of his hypnosis subject, Hardrup.

Key personnel during the CIA venture into hypnosis included a number of prominent professionals. Alden Sears conducted work in MKULTRA Subprojects 5, 25, 29 and 49. CIA consultant, New York psychologist and former president of the American Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Milton Kline told groundbreaking writer/researcher John Marks that he could create a patsy in three months and an assassin in six.

Psychiatrist Martin Orne conducted hypnosis-related research within MKULTRA Subproject 84. He published many papers on the subject of hypnosis and was considered a leading expert. Orne explained to the Agency and on a number of occasions that persuading someone to do something while hypnotized was not entirely different from encouraging a person not hypnotized to carry out a desired action, in that the circumstances had to be framed in manners of which the subject would approve and agree. For instance, whether killing a person is atrocious or heroic is a matter of context, and possibly as understood by Anderson Gray in 1890's Kansas.

Edward F. Deshere, in his now declassified CIA report, Hypnosis in Interrogation, referenced the work of Orne several times. Deshere wrote:
Orne has shown that the demand characteristics of an experimental situation may greatly influence a subject's hypnotic behavior. It is clear that at some level any cooperative subject wishes an experiment to "work out," wishes to help fulfill the experimenter's expectations. If he grasps the purpose of the experiment or the bias of the experimenter, he is disposed toward producing behavior which will confirm the experimenter's hypothesis. This is particularly true in a hypnotic relationship.

Orne was featured in an article written by Dr. Patricia Greenfield, the sister of John Marks, published in the December 1977 edition of the American Psychological Association Monitor. Commenting on medical professionals acting as MKULTRA consultants and the liabilities inherent to conducting such research, Orne told Greenfield, "We are sufficiently ineffective so that our findings can be published."

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

UFO Tunnel Vision

My interest in the UFO phenomenon evolved over the years to include an interest in the intelligence community, or IC. This should be quite understandable, as those even mildly familiar with the UFO scene should be well aware you can't toss a dead rat in the American UFO community without hitting a spook.

He shouted out, "Who killed the Kennedys?!"
Those of us interested in ufology and its sub-categories, such as alleged alien abduction, are also aware you don't have to pull too many loose threads before you find yourself immersed in researching conspiracies such as the Kennedy assassinations. Topics such as intelligence agencies, mind control and the exploitation of involuntary human research subjects might become standard fare for the thorough and sincere researcher of UFOs.

My expanding networking circles and selected reading materials naturally came to include increasing numbers of researchers and authors with interests in the Cold War, its conspiracies and their historical significance. In the process, I came to understand more about psychological warfare and the IC. I learned about circumstances such as a 1949 USAF Project Grudge report that noted, "Planned release of unusual aerial objects coupled with the release of related psychological propaganda could cause mass hysteria."

Indeed it could. I confidently suspect it has.

I learned something called electronic countermeasures were used to create false radar paints. According to a report composed by CIA man Gene Poteat, Project PALLADIUM was jointly conducted during the mid 20th century by the NSA, CIA and DoD, and phantom aircraft of any size desired could be made to appear to travel on any flight path at any speed and altitude. In at least some circumstances the false paints were coordinated with the release of what Poteat described as "balloon-borne metalized spheres of different sizes."

I read transcripts of Congressional hearings and books by writer/researchers such as John Marks that clearly confirmed the exploitation of involuntary human research subjects. The bizarre and extreme nature of experiments conducted within operations such as ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD and MKULTRA were of such questionable conditions that the mental health of the project personnel themselves would be called into question. One CIA officer, Marks reported, after reading a project memo, wrote to his boss, "If this is supposed to be covered up as a defensive feasibility study, it's pretty damn transparent." Circumstances portrayed in now declassified documents bear striking similarities to those reported by select self-described alien abductees.

As I became more familiar with researchers and genres outside the UFO community, I learned something I think is important yet widely eludes the average UFO enthusiast: Researchers within genres that overlap with ufology, such as the Cold War and conspiracies of historical significance, tend to hold much more complete and accurate perspectives of the IC – and its specific players – than do their ufology counterparts. People who research and write about Cold War secrets often demonstrate thorough understandings of complex dynamics involving members of the IC who played roles in ufology. Such researchers tend to understand the potential relevance of such circumstances more than seems to be the case among members of the UFO community. 

UFO-researchers often appear to suffer from a tunnel vision type of bias; they tend to view everything in the context of possible alien visitation. Perhaps in some instances it is due to sincere lack of abilities to think critically and consider broad ranges of possibilities, while in other cases it appears intentional and disingenuous suppression of certain material and circumstances is likely. Ufologists (who fail to account for Cold War relevance), if they broach the subject of the IC at all, tend to focus on relatively trivial and often hypothetical circumstances, as compared to forming wider and more practical contexts. Many of them seemingly automatically and prematurely equate the IC activity in ufology with confirmation of an alien presence. Seldom are deeper implications and evolving objectives of intelligence agencies from one era to the next taken into account. The UFO community and its researchers rarely consider the overall careers of intelligence officers who moonlight as ufologists, as compared to focusing virtually solely upon their UFO-related activities. All of that is the case in spite of the wide availability of factual material that could provide deeper insight. To ignore such material is detrimental to accurate reporting and counterproductive to identifying truth.

Investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen hit the proverbial ball over the fence with Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program that Brought Nazi Scientists to America. The author provided a thorough accounting of intriguing circumstances, some of which were never before released, surrounding the end of World War II and its spy games. The book is a fine work that should appeal to many genres. UFO-researchers would be well advised to take note of the professional research skills demonstrated by its author.

The UFO community might also be wise to consider the manners intelligence officials practice deception, and in what capacities. In the case of Operation Paperclip, parameters were initially set dictating the circumstances of which German scientists could be recruited, yet were systematically expanded. In Orwellian-like fashion of pigs revising and whitewashing community rules painted on the barn wall, US officials repeatedly reworded the parameters to eventually allow recruitment of basically anybody, including known Nazi war criminals. The US government intentionally hid the circumstances while offering asylum and employment to German officers. Such officers included men who had been responsible for the design and implementation of slave labor camps and agonizingly cruel experiments conducted on human research subjects resulting in inconceivable numbers of deaths.

During the Nuremberg trials, some of the very rare survivors provided testimony. One man, a former prisoner at a concentration camp, attempted to stab his abuser during the hearings. He attacked the Nazi for what was described as surgically removing part of his liver without the use of anesthesia.

Another young Polish woman and a medical doctor testified how, while she was held at a concentration camp, her shins were intentionally broken and infected with gangrene, apparently in order to study the circumstances. Her abuser went on to be employed in America for a time. 

Such experiments included studies of dehydration/dying of thirst, freezing to death and effects of altitude and air pressure. The vast majority of research subjects died in the process, sometimes while being intermittently photographed doing so.

The men recruited during Paperclip numbered over 1,000 and many went on to hold key positions in American corporations and intelligence operations. Some became high profile public figures who were falsely portrayed to be good world citizens oppressed by the Nazi rise to power. Their work included significant aspects of the American space program, and they were among the original architects of CIA behavior modification/mind control ventures. We might be wise to look into that more deeply, or at least consider its potential relevance, from time to time.        

I was recently alerted to an interesting item by Lisa Pease via Twitter. Pease is a conspiracy-researcher with a competent working knowledge of the IC. An expert on the 1960's assassinations, and particularly the murder of Robert Kennedy, she co-edited The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X, a 2003 book containing several of her published articles. Pease was recently interviewed on Black Op Radio and is currently in the process of composing a second book. A sample of her written work may be viewed in her 2011 Salon piece, The other Kennedy conspiracy. It contains some potentially quite relevant aspects of hypnosis, among other points of interest. 

Pease tweeted a link to a 1989 edition of the Journal of the American Folklore Society. It contained a report authored by Lydia M. Fish, who explored the activities of General Edward G. Lansdale. The general served in Southeast Asia and was described by former Director of Central Intelligence William Colby as one of the ten greatest spies of all time.

While the IC-related items mentioned above should indeed be of interest to the UFO community, they are but a small sample of the many, many circumstances of which researchers of Fortean phenomena might be wise to take into account before promoting and rushing to fantastic assumptions. En route to considering Lansdale's trickery, let us briefly review the exploits of British professional magician turned intelligence officer Jasper Maskelyne.

Jasper Maskelyne
He was involved in deception operations during Word War II, according to such sources as a 1950 RAND (Research and Development) Corporation report submitted to the USAF and titled, The Exploitation of Superstitions for Purposes of Psychological Warfare. Major Maskelyne at one point apparently manufactured an approximately twelve-foot tall devil-like device that scared the daylights out of Italian peasants. The ruse assisted in creating support for English troops while villagers were led to believe the demon was associated with German forces. Interestingly and as Nick Redfern wrote, the circumstances were curiously similar to the Flatwoods Monster of UFO history, and the RAND report predated the Flatwoods case by two years.

General Lansdale was apparently a quick study of such psychological warfare techniques. Lydia M. Fish reported the following circumstances which occurred during the 1950's:
He made good use of these techniques, and of his knowledge of Filipino superstitions, in one of his most famous exploits. The Filipino army had not been able to evict a squadron of Huks from the area of a garrison town. A combat psychological warfare squad was brought in and, under Lansdale's direction, planted stories among town residents of an asuang or vampire living on the hill where the Huks were based. A famous local soothsayer, they said, had predicted that men with evil in their hearts would become its victim. After giving the stories time to circulate, the squad set up an ambush on a trail used by the Huks and, when a patrol came by, snatched the last man. They punctured his neck with two holes, held the body upside down until it was drained of blood, and put it back on the trail. The next day the entire Huk squadron moved out of the area (Lansdale 1960:6-7).

USAF Gen. Edward G. Lansdale
Lansdale's operations also included the use of soothsayers for propaganda purposes in Vietnam during the 1960's. He oversaw the printing and distribution of literature containing predictions of a dark future for Communists as supposedly foreseen by the most famous astrologers. Several soothsayers were willing to cooperate – and Lansdale didn't stop there.

"It is suggested that the U.S. Mission compile a list of the personal soothsayers and astrologers who service leading Vietnamese personalities, particularly those who will be candidates in the forthcoming Presidential campaign," Lansdale wrote in 1967 to Ambassador Ellsworth Bunker. "These soothsayers have a decided influence on the activities of many of the Vietnamese leaders, and their guidance may not always coincide with U.S. objectives. In turn, most soothsayers are vulnerable to certain influences, also.

"Perhaps such a project is already being carried out, unknown to me. If so, I can think of some folks such as [Vietnamese] General Loan who deserve a bit of influencing."

Jeff Ritzmann of Paranormal Waypoint published a blog post last year in which he addressed the likelihood U-2 spy planes related to Area 51 accounted for a surge in inexplicable aerial phenomena and as reported in the news. Ritzmann pointed out that specific missions and flight patterns could potentially be correlated with UFO reports. Doing so, he explained, might possibly reveal data and situations of interest if anyone had the inclination to conduct the research, and particularly as opposed to investing large amounts of time and energy in arguing hypothetical circumstances.

I have often thought similar about Project PALLADIUM. If we know false radar paints were created, and were in some circumstances accompanied by the release of unusual aerial objects, it would seem we might take an interest in clarifying when, where and similar details that might be declassified. Such research might be considered comparable to a most practical list of known satellite re-entries as maintained by Ted Molczan and recently explored by Robert Sheaffer.      

UFO-researchers would be well served to occasionally take a step back from what seems to so often become the all engrossing world of UFOs and high strangeness, and look for a bit more context. That might particularly be the case when reviewing events that so frequently include the activities and interests of members of the intelligence community, a demographic skilled in deception. UFO enthusiasts, if sincere, could learn valuable lessons, important skills and relevant information from professional researchers in related genres which overlap with ufology.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Dr. Garry Nolan Talks Ata, Starchild Skull and Science

The Atacama specimen
Dr. Garry Nolan is a geneticist at the Stanford School of Medicine. He is among the mainstream scientists showing a willingness to review evidence of what some believe to be an extraterrestrial presence, as demonstrated in his work on Dr. Steven Greer's Atacama Humanoid and the late Lloyd Pye's Starchild Skull. Whatever we may make of Greer and his tactics, his inclination to include Nolan in the examination of Ata should be considered a most relevant and interesting turn of events within the UFO community. 

In an effort to keep up with the ongoing saga, I recently emailed Dr. Nolan and asked if he would field a few questions for a blog post. He agreed.

According to his Stanford profile, Dr. Nolan earned a Ph.D. in genetics from Stanford and a B.S. in genetics from Cornell. He is a professor of microbiology and immunology at Baxter Laboratory and a member of the Stanford Cancer Institute. He was appointed to the Board of External Experts of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, and the director of the Stanford NHLBI of the NIH. His honors include an Outstanding Research Achievement from Nature Publishing Group, a Burrough's Wellcome Investigator's Award in Pharmacology and multiple awards from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

The gist of our email exchanges follow. I wrote:

How did you become involved with Dr. Greer and the examination of the Atacama specimen? Please describe the circumstances and arrangements.

I interpret from your published statements concerning Ata that you find the specimen somewhat curiously interesting from a variety of perspectives, but at this point you are convinced it was human and have no reason to suspect it represents anything of extraterrestrial origin. Is that correct?

Could you please describe where you go from here? How do you see genetic research shaping and contributing to investigation of alleged extraterrestrials, Bigfoot and related circumstances?

Nolan explained:
We are writing for publication now on ATA. I have brought in some very high level experts to help me assemble and mine the genome for results that might explain the morphology of the specimen. The specimen has interesting mutations, but all mainstream genetics. Nothing more can be said at this point as we are going to let the academic review take its course.
Origin of my interest: When a friend of mine let me know about Greer’s specimen I thought "well, I can analyze that — if there’s DNA I can work on it".  So, literally on a whim I emailed Greer and offered my help, and he answered very shortly thereafter. We met when he was out here in California and I learned about his movie Sirius (for which I agreed to be filmed). I was honored he trusted me to help. I arranged to have a dissecting microscope delivered to the site in Barcelona where the specimen resided along with instructions from Dr. Lachman (pediatric bone specialist here at Stanford who "wrote the book" on bone growth disorders in neonates and young children) on what angles he would need for the Xrays to best diagnose the condition of the specimen. The rest is part of the movie. 
As to the utility of DNA I am ambivalent. It’s so easy to contaminate DNA or misinterpret the results. I worry about this being done in the hands of other people who start out with a conclusion and interpret everything in the context of that conclusion. What do we learn then? You can’t be "just a skeptic", but you also can’t start with a predetermined belief.
As to the general application of how to use DNA forensic evidence for exploration of claimed sightings, skeletons, or interactions – buyer beware. It is so easy to be tricked by DNA analysis that it does need the hands of people with the right experience to get it technically correct. And the computation required is not "desktop" — you have to be able to access databases of human allelic variants, ethnic variation in DNA, etc. to be able to put results in context.
Inquiring about circumstances surrounding the Starchild Skull, I wrote:

Would you please describe how you first came in contact with Lloyd Pye and subsequently involved with the Starchild Project?

Lloyd Pye and the Starchild Skull
If I understand your previous comments correctly, you are extremely confident that suppositions are premature that suggest the Starchild Skull to be somehow linked to extraterrestrials. You did find aspects of the skull somewhat interesting, however, and informed Starchild Project researchers that protein sequence testing would potentially be a much more practical pursuit (than DNA sequencing) for several reasons. Those reasons included a higher likelihood of correctly establishing provenance and avoiding issues of sample contamination. Is that correct, and would you please comment on such circumstances?

Nolan replied: 
I reached out to Dr. Pye originally, and subsequently met him in Manchester, UK, around my offer to examine the skull (after looking online at his evidence). He was very forthcoming and brought the specimen here to Stanford (I paid for the cost of his visit). We had it examined with two high end instruments and by a noted bone specialist. While the skull is certainly unusual (no one can deny that), it also did not fall under the provenance of any known genetic syndromes (despite the skeptics online) according to local experts. So I think the Starchild group’s statements about that latter point are credible.
However, that doesn’t mean it’s not a NEW, purely human, syndrome that affected the skull structure of the deceased. According to the bone specialist he still felt it fell within the realm of "unusual, but still human". He didn’t rule anything out, but he also didn’t suggest "not human". Interpret that last statement with all due care.
Your summary of my online statements about the Starchild Skull (so far) is fair. Their (paraphrased) reply to points were essentially "We thank Dr. Nolan, but respectfully disagree" – which I feel is sidestepping the key issue. The facts are not open to interpretation unless they want to rewrite the rules of genetics. There is no analysis available by which they can take the data they have provided me, or on the web, to make the claims they do about FoxP2. I can only guess at the reasons they want to keep up such an obviously incorrect claim.
Happy to give them room to prove their point as I am more than willing to consider alternative interpretations (I am probably more open to this than most mainstream biomedical scientists). There is no outcome I would enjoy more than the Starchild Team proving me wrong on the larger point of what they think they have. They just are not there yet — not even close with the genetics.
The problem with the Starchild claims are they are too easy with even a college class in evolutionary genetics to dismiss as overstated. Their current claims, using the available evidence, undermine their goals. And (frankly) allows less open-minded skeptics to paint reasonable scientists interested in the area with the "enthusiast" brush. That discredits the larger goal of understanding exactly what is going on with the Skull and other phenomenon. Only good science, credibly applied (and not as wishful thinking) is going to help understand putative evidence in the form of bodily remains. The Starchild team should stick to verifiable claims, and move forward with good science. As I noted, there are more nuanced ways to look at the Starchild skull that cannot be easily disputed (protein). It appears the team has accepted to investigating that suggested avenue. I am hopeful they have other orthogonal verifications planned as well. I hope the protein works out for them because any DNA result first has to pass many credibility tests regarding the huge potential for contamination the remains encountered over the years.
To be clear — I am not looking to "debunk" anyone. I am looking to get the more "incredible" claims off the table, if scientifically disproven, so the nuanced interpretations and more subtle evidence can be better examined. The answer to the whole problem of "are they here" I doubt is going to be found in the most obvious and sensational cases. 
So, I wish them luck. Truly.